Washington D.C. is the latest jurisdiction to look at whether the rules surrounding law firm ownership should be changed.
Bloombergs report that DC’s bar is to look at alternatives to the present law firm ownership rules, saying it will look at the evolving legal service delivery models, which includes non-lawyer ownership of law firms.
Bar members will have the opportunity to express their views on proposed changes, which would involve fee-sharing and other “alternative business structures” might prove beneficial to firms and their clients.
Such changes have been supported by access to justice advocates across the country who seek more affordable options for Americans seeking legal help. But opponents of rule changes have expressed concerns, including about threats posed to attorney independence and legal ethics, Bloomberg Big Law Business report.
Changes to law firm ownership have already been examined in Arizona, California, and Utah, as well as Chicago, which for the last several months have been weighing similar changes.
Many proposed changes involve modifying Bar Rule 5.4 and its strict limits on law firm ownership.
Andrew Perlman, dean of Suffolk Law School in Boston, said in a written statement that the D.C. Bar announcement is “an encouraging development.”
“Decades ago, D.C. became a leader in this area, and D.C. has the opportunity once again to play a leadership role,” he said.
Big Four Interest
The possibility of changes to the ownership of law firms will be particularly interesting for the Big Four accountancies.
Law firm leaders have noted that the Big Four and other alternative legal service providers, all of whom are already mounting significant competition to traditional law firm services, could take advantage of such a change by opening new legal operations that compete more directly with law firms.
D.C.’s version of Rule 5.4 is already slightly less restrictive than the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 5.4 that most states have adopted, which forbids partnerships between lawyers and nonlawyers if any of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.
Recent Posts on LawFuel
- How Aaron Teitelbaum Led DOJ’s Google TakedownWho Is Aaron Teitelbaum, The DOJ’s Antitrust Virtuoso Who Helped Topple Google’s Ad Tech Empire?… Read more: How Aaron Teitelbaum Led DOJ’s Google Takedown
- The Profit Per Lawyer Olympics Sees Three New Firms Medal in 2024’s Money MarathonIn a year when lawyers in swanky glass towers were booking profits faster than partners could update their Patek Philippe collections, three new firms have crashed the Am Law 100’s exclusive “Super Rich” party. Dechert, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, and Jenner & Block have all secured VIP access to the club where profits per lawyer hit at least $550,000 and revenue per lawyer tops $1.1 million.
- Five More Law Firms Pledge $600M to Dodge Executive Order BulletsBiglaw’s Trump Surrender Tom Borman, LawFuel contributing editor In what appears to be a growing… Read more: Five More Law Firms Pledge $600M to Dodge Executive Order Bullets
- Susman Godfrey Vows to Fight Trump Executive OrderTrump’s Law Firm Hit List Grows Tom Borman, LawFuel contributing editor When the former president… Read more: Susman Godfrey Vows to Fight Trump Executive Order
- Former Skadden Lawyers Express “Deep Outrage” Over Trump RepresentationWhat Did The Skadden Letter Say? In a strongly worded letter delivered to Executive Partner… Read more: Former Skadden Lawyers Express “Deep Outrage” Over Trump Representation
- Who Are The Leading Lawyers Who Helped Pushback On The Trump Executive Orders?The opposition mounted by over 500 law firms against Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting law firms was a remarkable show of unity in a profession facing intense criticism for its compliance and genuflection before the President. The collective action, which culminated in the submission of an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie’s lawsuit, was orchestrated by Munger Tolles & Olson, with former Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, Jr., leading the charge as counsel for the amici.
- The Great Law Firm Rebellion Sees Young Associates Stage Unprecedented Exodus Over Trump DealsIn the marble-lined corridors of legal power, a rebellion is brewing over the ‘Trump deals’ being made by biglaw firms targeted by the administration in recent weeks. Associates at two of America’s most prestigious law firms are doing what many might have thought to have been the unthinkable—resigning from coveted positions that pay north of $220,000 annually to protest their firms’ Faustian bargains with President Trump, marking perhaps the most significant crisis of conscience Big Law has faced in a generation.
- Lawyers may soon charge $10,000 an hour thanks to AI, says LexisNexis CEOLexisNexis CEO Sean Fitzpatrick recently made a jaw-dropping prediction that lawyers leveraging AI could charge up to $10,000 per hour within the decade. He says 39 percent of private practice lawyers now expect to adjust their billing practices due to AI, up from only 18 percent in January 2024. The tension between skyrocketing rates and fundamental business model changes creates the perfect storm for the legal industry with the onset of AI tools.
- What Trump’s Anti-DEI Order Means for European Companies (And Why Every Lawyer Should Be Paying Attention)Nearly 70 percent of European companies with U.S. government contracts are now caught in a cross-border compliance nightmare that could fundamentally reshape corporate diversity policies worldwide. The Trump administration has begun demanding European companies comply with the President’s executive order banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, which follows his moves against major law firms in the US on the DEI issue.
- 700+ Attorneys Unite Against Trump’s Law Firm CrackdownThe Trump Crackdown on Law Firms Meets Resistance Ben Thomson, Legal contributing editor US lawyers… Read more: 700+ Attorneys Unite Against Trump’s Law Firm Crackdown
