Dentons Australia Face PR Crisis Over CEO’s Anti-Vax, Anti-Semitic Storm

Dentons doug lawfuel

Dentons Australia has distanced itself from its Australian CEO Doug Stipanicev due to a controversy involving anti-vaccine and allegedly anti-Semitic content.

Dentons is the largest law firm in the world by lawyer numbers, although sixth in terms of revenue.

The controversy has had a rippling effect across the legal and business community as the firm tries to stem the storm.

Doug Stipanicev serves as Dentons’ Australian chair and Australasia Region CEO and has been accused of sending an email containing anti-vaccine material to a former partner which reportedly included a conspiracy-laden anti-vaccine pamphlet, containing allegedly anti-Semitic content.

Dentons’ Response

In response to the allegations, Doug Stipanicev has voluntarily stepped aside from his management roles at Dentons “in accordance with good governance” while the matter is being investigated.

Dentons’ chair has stated that he “abhors” the offensive statements contained in the anti-vaccine report that was shared with the partner

    Implications

    The incident has created what is being described as an “anti-vax storm” for Dentons[2]. As a global law firm with a significant presence in Australia, this controversy could potentially impact Dentons’ reputation and operations in the region.

    By distancing itself from Stipanicev’s alleged actions and initiating an investigation, Dentons appears to be taking steps to address the situation and mitigate any potential damage to its brand and client relationships.

    Get Your Power Law News

    Get the top law news weekly that's fun to read
    Powered by Kit

    Rudy Giuliani Disbarred: The Further Fall of “America’s Mayor” in D.C.

    Rudyguiliani lawfuel

    Rudy Giuliani Disbarrment

    We saw it coming, but now Rudy Giuliani, former Mayor of New York City (“America’s Mayor”) and Trump attorney, has been disbarred in Washington, D.C., following a ruling by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

    This decision comes in the wake of similar disciplinary action taken against Giuliani in New York earlier this year.

    The D.C. court’s ruling was based on reciprocal discipline stemming from Giuliani’s disbarment in New York, noting that Giuliani failed to respond to an order to show cause as to why he should not face the same penalty in D.C. as he did in New York.

    Background and Context

    Giuliani’s legal troubles are closely tied to his role in former President Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election. In New York, Giuliani was found to have made false and misleading statements about the election while serving as Trump’s personal attorney.

    The New York disbarrment involved a variety of serious allegations including:

    The he made false and misleading statements about the 2020 presidential election. The New York appeals court found “uncontroverted evidence” that Giuliani spread “demonstrably false and misleading statements” to courts, lawmakers and the public during his efforts to overturn the election results.

    The court found that

    The court determined that Giuliani “repeatedly and intentionally made false statements” about the 2020 election, some of which were deemed perjurious. He had “baselessly attacked and undermined the integrity of this country’s electoral process”.

    He was found to have “flagrantly misused” his position as Trump’s lawyer and “deliberately violated some of the most fundamental tenets of the legal profession”.

    The court concluded that Giuliani’s conduct posed an “immediate threat” to the public interest.

    The New York court emphasized that Giuliani’s false statements and unethical conduct were particularly egregious given his prominent position as a lawyer and former public official. It was these findings that led to Giuliani’s disbarment in New York, which then formed the basis for reciprocal disbarment in Washington D.C..

    Legal and Professional Consequences

    The disbarment in D.C. is the latest in a series of professional setbacks for Giuliani:

    • His law license in D.C. had been suspended since 2021.
    • He faces criminal charges in Georgia and Arizona related to election interference efforts.
    • A federal judge found him liable for defaming two Georgia election workers, resulting in a $148 million judgment against him.

    Reactions and Implications

    Giuliani’s spokesperson, Ted Goodman, criticized the decision, calling it “an absolute travesty and a total miscarriage of justice”

    He urged members of the legal community to speak out against what he described as a partisan decision

    But for “America’s mayor” it is a final slap for Giuliani, coming in a simple, single page order from the DC court.

    About The Author