The planned merger between Dewey Ballantine and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe has been abandoned because of wrangling over management control, ending one of the most anticipated combinations of the year.

Stock 18

The planned merger between Dewey Ballantine and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe has been abandoned amid wrangling over management control, ending one of the most anticipated combinations of the year.

The firms’ London offices were putting on brave faces in the wake of the decision.

Orrick London managing partner Martin Bartlam told The Lawyer: “We’ve always been fairly neutral to the merger. While it would have provided us with a bigger platform, which would have been a good thing, it would probably have been the only thing.”

Dewey London managing partner Fred Gander said: “We can finally focus on client work. The uncertainty is behind us.”

It is understood that there were three main hurdles: Dewey’s unfunded retirement benefits, the number of departing Dewey partners and management and governance at the new firm.

A Dewey source said: “With Ralph [Baxter] and Mort [Pierce] there would have only been one presiding partner. It was felt too much power would reside with one individual.”

Ten Dewey partners have left since merger talks were announced last October, including five from its flagship New York office.

The source said: “If you’re losing those kind of quality partners, you have to ask why. We had to take the merger talks back to the table before we lost any more.”


A £4m campaign to promote GDA labels, which show the guideline dai…

A £4m campaign to promote GDA labels, which show the guideline daily amounts of sugar, salt, fat and calories in each serving, will be launched on Monday by some of the UK’s largest food manufacturers. This action has reignited the debate over food labelling, but food law experts at Eversheds LLP say that experimenting with more than one system could benefit both the industry and consumers in the long term.

Owen Warnock, partner and food law specialist at international law firm Eversheds LLP, comments on the future for food labelling:

“The traffic light system of labelling was met with significant opposition from sectors of the industry when it was announced, so it comes as no surprise that a number of retailers and manufacturers are promoting the GDA front-of-pack labelling as an alternative to the FSA’s preferred system. However, it is unusual to see such a large segment of the food industry defying the FSA’s stance.

“Some cynics suggest that food businesses are opposing the traffic light system in order to protect their sales of less ‘healthy foods’ but, from our experience of working with the food industry, I am convinced the concerns are genuine on both sides of the debate.

“Legislation to support the FSA’s traffic light approach is unlikely in the short term unless the government tried to rely on its residual powers to protect public health. This is because the power to legislate in relation to food labelling rests with the European Union. Eventually we will see a pan-European law on front-of-pack nutrition labelling, but not for several years. When the time comes, one of the many factors which will influence the outcome will be the different voluntary systems of labelling in use in the UK and other countries.”

“It will be interesting to see if one of the two rival systems being promoted in the UK becomes dominant. However, many health campaigners are particularly worried that having two parallel systems will be the worst of all worlds – although in my view experimenting with both will help to find out which is the most beneficial for consumers and the industry in the long term.”

About The Author

Stay ahead in law news. Subscribe now.

LawFuel has been breaking news for lawyers since 2001. We're still first to market with the news that powers lawyers - get our weekly headlines.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.