Abuser Was Mia Farrow, Not Woody Allen Says Family Member

Moses farrow lawfuel

The sexual abuse allegations against Woody Allen have not been supported by one of the family members, with Dylan Farrow’s brother Moses accusing Mia Farrow of abuse, rather than his adopted father.

Dylan Farrow penned an open letter revealing details of the sexual abuse she claims happened 20 years ago, allegedly at the hands of her adopted father Allen.  Her claims have been supported by both Mia Farrow, her mother, and Ronan, her other brother.

Moses Farrow, a family therapist – is not however supporting her and says he can not only see the other side of things but that Mia Farrow was the abusive one.

“Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” Moses, 36, told People magazine.

<iframe width=”460″ height=”315″ src=”//www.youtube.com/embed/1YbuSq3dWjc” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

ABC report him:  “My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister. And I hated him for her for years. I see now that this was a vengeful way to pay him back for falling in love with Soon-Yi.”

Woody Allen, 78, and Mia Farrow, 68, split in 1992, after the director began a relationship with Farrow’s adopted daughter Soon-Yi Farrow Previn. Allen was never charged with any molestation and married Soon-Yi in 1997.

“It is tragic that after 20 years a story engineered by a vengeful lover resurfaces even though it was fully vetted and rejected by independent authorities. The one to blame for Dylan’s distress is neither Dylan nor Woody Allen,” Allen’s attorney Elkan Abramowitz said in a statement to CNN.

But Mia Farrow is asserting that Dylan’s claims are true that when she was 7 years old, Allen led her to a “dim, closet-like attic” and “then he sexually assaulted me.”

Moses doesn’t believe this happened to his sister.

And Allen’s lawyer, Elkan Abramowitz says that Mia Farrow is embittered and living in the past as well as brainwashing her children.  Speaking on the “Today” show, Abramowitz said Farrow couldn’t handle her former husband getting a Golden Globe Lifetime Achievement Award.

 


The Six Most Important Legal Factors In Unpaid Internships

Unpaid internships lawfuel


Unpaid internships have been firmly in the spotlight in recent years. Images of students working for nothing on the edge of poverty have led to a number of legal cases in the US. While unpaid internships were once seen as a rite of passage, the fact students are readily suing their employers has meant companies have to tread carefully. 

To make an unpaid internship legal, it needs to be a position that advantages the trainee. If it benefits the employee, it’s considered illegal and the student must receive the minimum wage.

We go through six of the most important legal factors that make an unpaid internship legal.

1.      Educational Environment 

The training given within the internship must resemble the same training that would be given in an educational environment. In other words, it can’t involve sitting at a desk shuffling papers. It needs to involve someone teaching them best practices and proper work processes. 

2.      The Internship Must Benefit the Intern 

This is a difficult one to prove because it’s highly subjective. What the employer needs to show any judge in a court scenario is they had the intention of benefitting the intern. In other words, the intern’s value to the company is zero. The company is doing this to help the intern learn for the future. 

3.      Employee Displacement 

No intern should ever displace an employee. They should be working under existing staff members. This applies equally to full-time staff and part-time staff. Since the intern isn’t classified as an employee, their presence should have no influence on the people who are considered employees. 

4.      Immediate Benefit 

The company must not gain any immediate benefit from an employing an intern and having them carry out regular operations. In other words, at no point should they be working at a post on their own like a regular employee. They should only operate a post for training purposes and must be under constant supervision. 

The law further states, in many cases, that the company might even be hindered by the fact they’re working with an intern. 

5.      Job Offer 

The intern isn’t guaranteed a full position at the end of the internship. In other words, no employer should promise any position upon conclusion of the training period.

They can consider them for a full-time role, but it must never be a promise. Otherwise, this means the intern is essentially an employee in training, and is therefore entitled to a wage. 

6.      Wages 

Both the employer and intern understand there are no wages involved in the internship. Paid internships must pay at least the minimum wage, and in this case they wouldn’t technically be an intern. Instead, they would be a trainee or a contractor.

This doesn’t cover expenses.

The company can still opt to pay for travel and lunch expenses for the intern, but this must be clearly stated in writing. In the case of large firms, they might even pay for temporary accommodation, should the student have to travel exceedingly long distances to attend their internship. 

Author Bio –

James Whitaker is the creative head behind this article. He is a successful entrepreneur, a passionate philanthropist and an ardent blogger. He says he only works with Boteler, Finley and Wolfe Law Firm and their talented lawyers as they have taken him out of many tricky situations.  

About The Author